Family Therapy Note Example 1: Teen school refusal (structural)
Family with a 15-year-old identified client, both parents and a younger sibling.
- Family System
- Family session attended by mother (42), father (44), identified client S. (15), and younger brother L. (11). Family structure: intact nuclear family, married 18 years. No extended family locally (grandparents in another state). Presenting concern: S.'s declining academic performance (A/B student to D/F), school refusal (missed 12 days this quarter), and increasing conflict with parents. Parents disagree on approach: father favors strict consequences, mother advocates for "understanding." Family referred by school counselor after parent-teacher conference. This is session 3 of family therapy.
- Interaction Patterns
- Several notable patterns observed: 1) Cross-generational coalition between mother and S. When father attempts to set limits, mother intervenes with "but she's going through a lot," undermining parental hierarchy. 2) Father becomes increasingly rigid and authoritarian when he feels undermined, escalating the cycle. 3) L. is parentified: attempts to mediate parental conflict, stated "Mom and Dad, stop fighting. You're upsetting her." 4) S. oscillates between tearful helplessness (directed at mother) and defiant anger (directed at father). 5) During enactment exercise, parents could not sustain a joint conversation about rules for S. for more than 90 seconds before disagreeing. 6) Positive: genuine caring is evident across all family members. Father became tearful when S. described feeling "like a disappointment."
- Interventions
- 1. Structural family therapy: Conducted enactment, asking parents to discuss and agree on one school attendance expectation with S. present. Interrupted when mother undermined father's position to highlight pattern. 2. Boundary intervention: Gently redirected L. out of mediator role, saying "That's a grown-up job, L., and you're doing great just being a kid." 3. Reframing: Reframed S.'s school refusal from "defiance" to "distress signal that the family system needs adjustment." 4. Circular questioning: Asked each family member how they think others feel about the school situation, which revealed significant misperceptions (S. believed father "doesn't care," father was surprised and hurt). 5. Psychoeducation: Discussed adolescent development and the family's need to adjust boundaries as S. individuates.
- Family Response
- Significant shift when father expressed emotion about S. feeling like a disappointment; S. made eye contact with father for first time in session. Mother appeared reflective when pattern of undermining was named and stated "I didn't realize I was doing that." Parents were able to agree on one shared expectation (S. will attend school Monday-Thursday, with Friday flexibility if other days are met) when given structured support. L. visibly relaxed when given permission to not be the mediator. S. engaged more when she perceived parents as a team rather than divided. Family demonstrated capacity for flexibility when structural support is provided. Resistance noted: father resistant to exploring his own family-of-origin patterns regarding discipline.
- Plan
- 1. Continue weekly family sessions. 2. Next session: Parents-only session to strengthen parental alliance and develop shared behavioral expectations. 3. Homework for parents: Practice making one joint decision about household rules this week, without children present, then present as unified front. 4. Homework for S.: Complete school attendance log, marking each day attended and rating mood 1-10. 5. Coordinate with school counselor (release signed) to request academic accommodation plan while family stabilizes. 6. Individual session with S. recommended to assess for underlying depression or anxiety contributing to school refusal. 7. Revisit L.'s parentification role in session 5 and assess need for individual support. Next session: 1 week (parents only).